Lately I’ve been doing some career counseling for people off Twitter (long story). The central drama for many people goes something like this:
“I’m a senior engineer, but I’m thinking about being a manager. I really like engineering, but I feel like I’m just solving the same problems over and over and it seems like the real problems are people problems. I have to be a manager to get promoted. I hope it isn’t terrible, once I make the switch. I hear it’s terrible.”
I’ve been meaning to write this post for a while. There’s a lot but let’s start with: Fuck the whole idea that only managers get career progression. And fuckkkk the idea you have to choose a “lane” and grow old there. I completely reject this kind of slotting.
“Your advice is bad and you should feel bad”:
The best frontline eng managers in the world are the ones that are never more than 2-3 years removed from hands-on work, full time down in the trenches. The best individual contributors are the ones who have done time in management.
And the best technical leaders in the world are often the ones who do both. Back and forth. Like a pendulum.
I’ve done this a few times myself now; start out as an early or first infra engineering hire, build the stack, then build the team, then manage the team, then … leave and start it all over again. I get antsy, I get restless. I start to feel like I know what I’m doing (… a telltale sign something’s wrong).
It’s a good cycle for people who like early stage companies, or have ADD. But I don’t see people talking about it as a career path. So I’m here to advocate for it, as an intentional and awesome way of life.
There are lots of people who do both well - but serially. Not simultaneously.
— Sarah Mei (@sarahmei) May 11, 2017
(h/t to @sarahmei who was tweetstorming this up at the EXACT SAME TIME as i was writing this. Yes Virginia, internet feminists ARE linked by a mystical hive brain.)
On being a manager (of technical projects)
Promoting managers from within means you get those razor sharp skills from the people who just built the thing. That gives them credibility, while they struggle with their newly achieved incompetence in a different role.
That’s one of the only ways you can achieve the temporary glory of a hybrid manager+tech lead. This is an unstable combination, because your engineering skills and context-sharpness are decaying the longer you do it.
You can only really improve at one of these things at a time: engineering or management. And if you’re a manager, your job is to get better at management. Don’t try to cling to your former glory.
Management is highly interruptive, and great engineering — where you’re learning things — requires blocking out interruptions. You can’t do these two opposite things at once. As a manager, it is your job to be available for your team, to be interrupted. It is your job to choose to hand off the challenging assignments, so that your engineers can get better at engineering.
5. Both code and people require the same thing to thrive: focused, sustained attention. No one does both well.
— Sarah Mei (@sarahmei) May 11, 2017
On being a tech lead (of people):
Conversely: the best tech leads in the world are always the ones who done time in management. This is not because they’re always the best programmers or debuggers; it’s because they know how to get shit done, which means they know how to communicate and manage other people.
A tech lead is a manager … but their first priority is achieving the task at hand, not grooming and minding the humans who work on it.
They still need the full manager toolset. They’ll need to know how to rally people and teams and motivate them, or how to triage and restart a stalled project that everybody dreads. They still need to connect the dots between business objectives and technical objectives, and break down big objectives into components. They need to be able to size up a junior engineer’s ability and craft a meaningful assignment, one that pushes their boundaries without crushing them … then do the same for another twenty contributors. This is management work, from the slightly shifted perspective of “Get Thing X Done” not “care for these people”.
So these tech leads usually spend more time in meetings than building things, and they will bitch about it but do it anyway, because writing code is not the best use of their time. Tech is the easy part, herding humans is the harder part.
Senior engineers who have both these toolsets are the kind of tech leads you can build an org around, or a company around. They get shit done. And they are rare.
Almost all of them have spent considerable time in management.
The Pendulum
We don’t talk about this nearly enough: the immense breadth and strength that accrues to engineers who make a practice of going back and forth.
Being an IC is like reverse-engineering how a company works with very little information. A lot of things seem ridiculous, or pointless or inefficient from the perspective of a leaf node. .
Being a manager teaches you how the business works. It also teaches you how people work. You will learn to have uncomfortable conversations. You will learn how to still get good work out of people who are irritated, or resentful, or who hate your guts. You will learn how to resolve conflicts, dear god will you ever learn to resolve conflicts. (Actually you’ll learn to YEARN for conflicts because straightforward conflict is usually better than all the other options.) You’ll go home exhausted every day and unable to articulate anything you actually did. But you did stuff.
You’ll miss the dopamine hit of fixing something or solving something. You’ll miss it desperately.
One last thing about management. There’s a myth that makes it really hard for people to stop managing, even when it makes them and everyone around them miserable. And that’s the idea that management is a promotion.
Management is NOT a promotion.
1. Becoming a manager is not a promotion - it's a lateral move onto a parallel track. You're back at junior level in many key skills.
— Sarah Mei (@sarahmei) May 11, 2017
Seriously, fuck that so hard. It is SUCH an insidious myth, and it leads to so many people managing even though they hate managing and have no business managing, and also starves the senior eng pool of the great mentors and elder wizards we need.
Management is not a promotion, management is a change of profession. And you will be bad at it for a long time after you start doing it. If you don’t think you’re bad at it, you aren’t doing your job.
Managing because it feeds your ego is a terrific way to be sure that your engineers get to report to someone miserable and resentful, someone who should really be writing code

or finding something else that brings them joy.
There’s nothing worse than reporting to someone forced into managing. Please don’t be one of the reasons people burn out hard on tech.
It isn’t a promotion, so you don’t have any status to give up. Do it as long as it makes you happy, and the people around you happy. Then stop. Go back to building things. Wait til you get that itch again.
Then do it all over again. <3
[…] branching out into management. Unlike almost all companies Intercom facilitates what some call the engineer/manager pendulum – or a switch back to the IC track after some time as a […]
[…] those shifts (and your inability to ramp up on them assuming a strong technical base – see “The Engineer/Manager Pendulum by Charity Majors”) are rare. The principles of sound software engineering practice are timeless. But either track […]
[…] also owe a debt to an article by Charity at https://charity.wtf/2017/05/11/the-engineer-manager-pendulum/ where she so eloquently laid out this engineer-manager-engineer pendulum that so many of us […]
[…] be joining as a software engineer / IC, rather than as a manager! I expect my career will take the pendulum form, switching between IC and management rather than pursuing exclusively one or the other. It’s […]
[…] Software engineering – going back to writing code or leading technical projects is also a possible route. We’re supportive of the engineer/manager pendulum. […]
[…] leaders oscillate between roles on the team and as a leader of the team in what has become known as the engineer/manager pendulum. By understanding the finer points of software development and being […]
[…] people who had gone through this transition. There are some great resources, such as the canonical Engineer/Manager Pendulum written by Charity Majors and this article on LeadDev written by Gemma Barlow and several […]
[…] Charity Majors – The Engineer/Manager Pendulum: The best frontline eng managers in the world are the ones that are never more than 2-3 years […]
[…] The Engineer/Manager Pendulum […]
[…] Software engineering – going back to writing code or leading technical projects is also a possible route. We’re supportive of the engineer / manager pendulum. […]
[…] Software engineering – going back to writing code or leading technical projects is also a possible route. We’re supportive of the engineer / manager pendulum. […]
[…] The engineering manager pendulum […]
[…] in those roles. If you are established or new in a Staff+ role or struggling between choosing the Engineering/Management pendulum, this book is for […]
[…] work plans for 2022 are deliberately imprecise. The pendulum would possibly swing within the different path. Or I would find yourself sinking my engineering […]
[…] The Engineer-Manager Pendulum […]
[…] more information and deeper insights about this career path, I suggest reading “The Engineer-Manager Pendulum ” […]